ArticleBJUI compass2025
Penile trauma management in absence of fracture: Long-term outcomes.
Article in BJUI compass, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Penile trauma management in absence of fracture: Long-term outcomes.BJUI compass · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study evaluates the clinical outcomes of patients with suspected penile fractures who were managed conservatively after MRI excluded tunica albuginea rupture or fracture. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted over a seven-year period, identifying patients who presented with symptoms suggestive of penile fracture. All patients who underwent MRI imaging to confirm or exclude the presence of a tunica albuginea rupture. Based on MRI findings, patients without confirmed fractures were managed conservatively, including instructions to avoid sexual activity and strenuous physical exertion. Follow-up assessments were conducted to monitor long-term complications, with a specific focus on erectile function, assessed via the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) and penile curvature. Results: Of the 30 patients with suspected penile fractures, MRI excluded fractures in 63%. Among these conservatively managed patients, approximately 60% developed erectile dysfunction (ED) and 27% developed penile curvature. Even in cases without confirmed fractures, patients with contusions demonstrated significant post-injury complications. Conclusion: MRI is effective in ruling out penile fractures, supporting the use of conservative management when fractures are not confirmed. However, conservative treatment alone is associated with a notable rate of complications, suggesting the potential benefit of early penile rehabilitation to address functional outcomes in these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.