ArticleJournal of clinical imaging science2025
Copyright and creative commons licenses in scholarly publishing: A practical guide for researchers.
Article in Journal of clinical imaging science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Building Open Science into Graduate Training in Clinical Psychology.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Copyright is a crucial aspect of scholarly publishing, governing the ownership, distribution, and permissible use of academic content. Traditional copyright laws grant exclusive rights to authors or publishers. In the era of open-access publication, Creative Commons (CC) licenses offer the flexibility to share scholarly work more openly while maintaining proper attribution. Understanding these licensing options is essential for researchers. This article explores the fundamental concepts of copyright, licensing, and CC in the context of scholarly publishing. It briefly explains how to search for copyright and licensing information on an article, properly attribute credit, and obtain permission for content reuse from the copyright holder. Failure to comply with copyright regulations can result in consequences such as legal disputes, financial penalties, and reputational damage. Hence, an understanding and responsible application of copyright and licensing principles are therefore essential for ethical and legally compliant scholarly communication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.