ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025
The effects of clonal integration and earthworms on the growth, active constituent accumulation in
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clonal integration drives divergent assembly of rhizosphere bacteria and fungi in Hydrocotyle vulgaris under cadmium heterogeneity.Folia microbiologica · 2026Article
- Nutrient addition and light supplementation modulate the growth of Glechoma longituba and soil microbial communities.Journal of the science of food and agriculture · 2026Article
- Clonal Integration and Root Morphological Plasticity ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Clonal integration represents a key ecological advantage of clonal plants, enabling resource transfer among interconnected ramets. Earthworm activity significantly influences soil processes and plant growth. However, it remains unclear whether the effects of earthworms on basal ramets can be transmitted to their apical counterparts through clonal integration. Methods: We conducted an experiment using Results: Clonal integration promoted the growth of apical ramets at the expense of basal ramets, resulting in no net gain or loss at the whole fragment level. Although the direct effect of earthworms on plant growth was minimal, they interact with clonal integration to affect the number of nodes and total stolon length. Clonal integration enhanced the accumulation of total flavonoids in the whole fragment, whereas earthworms had a significant negative effect on the accumulation of chlorogenic acid. Clonal integration significantly affected bacterial composition at both basal and apical portions, while concurrently reducing bacterial diversity. Earthworms accumulated specific fungal communities and increased fungal diversity at apical portions. Earthworms also reduced the difference within bacterial communities in the basal portions of both intact and severed treatments to some extent. Conclusion: Our findings indicate that clonal integration and earthworms influence the accumulation of active constituents in G. longituba at the whole fragment level, without significantly promoting plant growth. Moreover, earthworms alter the bacterial and fungal communities in the root zone of apical ramets via clonal integration. These results provide a theoretical foundation for the cultivation of this species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.