ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025
Deep learning-based approach for phenotypic trait extraction and computation of tomato under varying water stress.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence-driven advancements in agricultural biotechnology.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2026Review
- Multi-scale feature fusion-based vision mamba for robust plant disease image classification on field-acquired plantdoc data.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: With the advancement of imaging technologies, the efficiency of acquiring plant phenotypic information has significantly improved. The integration of deep learning has further enhanced the automatic recognition of plant structures and the accuracy of phenotypic parameter extraction. To enable efficient monitoring of tomato water stress, this study developed a deep learning-based framework for phenotypic trait extraction and parameter computation, applied to tomato images collected under varying water stress conditions. Methods: Based on the You Only Look Once version 11 nano (YOLOv11n) object detection model, adaptive kernel convolution (AKConv) was integrated into the backbone's C3 module with kernel size 2 convolution (C3k2), and a recalibration feature pyramid detection head based on the P2 layer was designed. Results and discussion: Results showed that the improved model achieved a 4.1% increase in recall, a 2.7% increase in mAP50, and a 5.4% increase in mAP50-95 for tomato phenotype recognition. Using the bounding box information extracted by the model, key phenotype parameters were further calculated through geometric analysis. The average relative error for plant height was 6.9%, and the error in petiole count was 10.12%, indicating good applicability and accuracy for non-destructive crop phenotype analysis. Based on these extracted traits, multiple sets of weighted combinations were constructed as input features for classification. Seven classification algorithms-Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine, Random Forest, Decision Tree, K-Nearest Neighbors, Naive Bayes, and Gradient Boosting-were used to differentiate tomato plants under different water stress conditions. The results showed that Random Forest consistently performed the best across all combinations, with the highest classification accuracy reaching 98%. This integrated approach provides a novel approach and technical support for the early identification of water stress and the advancement of precision irrigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.