Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41031275›Full record

ArticleClinical case reports2025

Long-Term Complications of Neglected Double-J Stent With Renal and Bladder Stone Formation: A Case Report From Sudan.

Abubaker Yassin, Osama Mohamed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Abubaker YassinDongola Specialized Hospital Dongola Northern State Sudan.
Osama MohamedDongola Specialized Hospital Dongola Northern State Sudan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-5327-8253

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Double-J (DJ) stents are commonly used to maintain ureteral patency after procedures like ureteral stone removal. Ideally, they should be replaced or removed within 6 to 12 weeks to avoid complications such as encrustation and stone formation. However, prolonged retention can lead to severe outcomes. This case report discusses a patient with a neglected DJ stent, which resulted in both renal and bladder stones. A 35-year-old Sudanese woman presented with right loin pain and dysuria. She had a DJ stent inserted 4 years ago after ureteroscopy for ureteral stone removal but did not follow up due to insufficient knowledge about the stent. Imaging revealed renal and bladder stones with significant encrustation. Transurethral cystolitholapaxy was performed successfully for the bladder stone. However, attempts to remove the DJ stent endoscopically were unsuccessful due to a large renal pelvic stone attached to the stent. The patient underwent pyelolithotomy to remove the stone together with the retained DJ. One month later, she had no complications and returned to normal activities. The lack of follow-up and understanding of the DJ stent led to complications. Extended stent retention increases the risk of encrustation and stone formation. Treatment often involves a multiple operations, including pyelolithotomy and endoscopic procedures, especially in resource-limited settings. This case highlights the need for comprehensive patient education, timely stent removal, and regular follow-up to prevent devastating complications from neglected DJ stents. It also emphasizes the importance of tailored treatment strategies in resource-constrained environments.

Indexed as

case reportscystolithiasisneglected ureteral stentspyelolithotomy

Identifiers

PMID41031275
PMCPMC12477056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.