ArticleFoot & ankle orthopaedics2025
Weightbearing CT Assessment of Medial Clear Space Volume Changes in Weber B Fractures: A Preliminary Analysis.
Article in Foot & ankle orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The clinical treatment of Weber B fibular fractures has primarily focused on the symmetry of the medial clear space. Numerous radiographic studies demonstrate no change in tibiotalar contact area until the deltoid ligament is disrupted. In contrast, more recent studies using weightbearing CT scan (WBCT) and 3D volume analysis suggest that medial clear space (MCS) volume can in fact increase in the setting of a Weber B fibular fracture even if initial radiographs are reassuring, possibly because of a loss of fibular buttress. This study aims to evaluate the ability of WBCT to quantify the impact of isolated Weber B fractures on MCS volume (3D), as well as understand the implication of increasing fibular displacement among patients with a symmetric MCS distance (1D) on initial radiographs. Methods: The study group included 18 patients with unilateral Weber B ankle fractures who underwent preoperative bilateral foot and ankle WBCT. The control group consisted of 60 patients with forefoot/midfoot conditions without ankle injury who underwent similar imaging. Measurements on WBCT images included (1) MCS distance; (2) syndesmotic area; (3) anterior, middle, and posterior distal tibiofibular distance; (4) fibular rotation; (5) distance from fibular tip to plafond; and (6) fibular fracture displacement. Additionally, volumetric measurements included (1) MCS volume, (2) syndesmotic joint volume from the tibial plafond extending to 3 cm and 5 cm proximally, and (3) lateral clear space volume were calculated. Area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) analysis and Delong test were used, and optimal cutoff values to distinguish between stable and unstable Weber B fractures without syndesmotic instability and MCS widening were determined using Youden J statistic. Results: Among patients with unilateral Weber B ankle fractures, all WBCT measurements showed no side-to-side difference in any parameter, except MCS volume ( Conclusion: In this preliminary study using WBCT, 3D MCS volume measurements showed statistical differences in Weber B fibular fractures compared with the contralateral side, even when 1D distance measurements appeared symmetric. A displacement threshold of 2.3 mm was identified through ROC analysis, although the clinical significance of these volumetric changes remains unclear and requires validation through clinical outcome studies. Level of Evidence: Level III, comparative diagnostic study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.