ArticleJSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
Comparison of Transvaginal Natural Orifice Surgery (vNOTES) and Laparoscopic Tubal Ligation: Effects on Postoperative Pain, Sexual Functions, and Surgical Outcomes.
Article in JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Postoperative pain after vNOTES versus laparoscopic hysterectomy: A procedure-specific comparative study.Turkish journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2026Article
- Effect of hysteroscopic cold -knife resection combined with dydrogesterone therapy on natural conception outcomes in women with endometrial polyps.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2026Article
- Comparison of sexual function outcomes after vNOTES and laparoscopic tubal sterilization.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Bilateral Salpingectomy for Sterilization: A Prospective Comparison of Laparoscopy and vNOTES.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic SurgeonsArticle
- Ruptured Tubal Ectopic Pregnancy Managed by Salpingectomy: vNOTES versus Conventional Laparoscopy.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic SurgeonsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) is a novel minimally invasive technique that eliminates the need for abdominal incisions. Compared to conventional laparoscopy (CL), vNOTES may offer reduced postoperative pain and faster recovery. While laparoscopy is the standard method for bilateral tubal ligation (BTL), limited comparative data exist regarding vNOTES for this indication. Aim: To compare postoperative outcomes, pain levels, and sexual function following BTL performed via vNOTES versus CL. Material and Methods: This retrospective comparative study included 43 women who underwent elective BTL between September 2023 and December 2024 (vNOTES: n = 23; CL: n = 20). Pain was assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) at 1, 6, and 24 hours postoperatively. Shoulder pain incidence, intra-abdominal pressure, need for intraoperative opioids, and 6-item Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI-6) scores were also evaluated. Operative time, blood loss, and length of hospital stay were recorded. Results: All procedures were completed without major complications. VAS pain scores at all measured time points were significantly lower in the vNOTES group ( Conclusions: vNOTES is a safe and effective alternative to CL for female sterilization. It offers significant benefits in terms of reduced early postoperative and shoulder pain, without negatively affecting sexual function or surgical safety. These findings highlight the potential advantages of vNOTES as a minimally invasive technique in gynecologic surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.