ArticleKinases and phosphatases2025
A Critical Look at the Crystal Structures of cAMP-Dependent Protein Kinases.
Article in Kinases and phosphatases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lysozyme revisited: evaluating models of a reference protein in structural biology.Current research in structural biology · 2026Article
- How to mitigate the caveat emptor burden of human and machine users of the Protein Data Bank.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We have evaluated the quality of all 325 deposits in the PDB (as of December 2024) that correspond to (or contain) the catalytic domain of cAMP-dependent protein kinases (PKA). Detailed analysis was possible for 289 deposits of crystal structures that included not only the atomic coordinates but also structure factors. These structures represent 35 years of studies, and it is not surprising that the more recent structures are generally of better quality than the older ones. We did not encounter deposits with very severe problems, although some minor problems were found. To assess whether a uniform method of structure re-refinement, as implemented in the pipeline and website PDB-REDO, leads to significant improvement of structural models, we compared structure quality indicators for the originally refined structures and their counterparts resulting from PDB-REDO refinement. The re-refinement procedure significantly improved only some older structures, while its success was generally limited. We paid particular attention to the quality of small-molecule ligands, finding that most of them fit the electron density very well. This type of analysis helps identify the highest quality structures among many deposits for certain protein families and, thus, could be extended to other groups of proteins as well.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.