ArticleSAGE open medicine2025
Role of second trimester uterine artery doppler in early prediction of preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction among high-risk Bahamian residents.
Article in SAGE open medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Uterine artery doppler velocimetry has proven to be efficient in the prediction of preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction. We aimed to determine its value among high-risk Bahamian women and the most predictive parameter. Methods: We prospectively observed 128 women to detect the frequency of preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction development in relation to uterine artery doppler velocimetry. The main outcome measures were resistance index, pulsatility index and notching. Results: The mean difference of 0.082 (±0.011; 95% CI: -0.096, -0.069) in the resistance index and 0.122 (±0.011; 95% CI: -0.144, -0.100) in the pulsatility index between those without preeclampsia and those with, was statistically significant ( Conclusion: The best predictor of preeclampsia was the Resistance Index indices, while end diastolic notching was the best predictor for intrauterine growth restriction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.