ReviewClinical Medicine Insights. Oncology2025
A Systematic Review of the Application of Artificial Intelligence in Colposcopy: Diagnostic Accuracy for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia and Cervical Cancer.
Review in Clinical Medicine Insights. Oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Additional Diagnostic Yield of Endocervical Curettage in Type 3 Transformation Zone for High-Grade Cervical Lesions: A Retrospective Analysis by Human Papillomavirus Genotype.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- High-Risk Clinical Characteristics and Risk Model for Unexpected Cervical Cancer Diagnosed After Surgery in Patients with LSIL/HSIL Biopsy.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly applied to colposcopy to enhance the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and cervical cancer. We conducted a systematic review to summarize the diagnostic performance achieved by AI‑based colposcopic systems. Methods: Following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, the PubMed database was searched using the search terms 'artificial intelligence' and 'colposcop*' for articles published between 2019 and 2024. From the initial 43 articles retrieved, 19 studies were selected based on specific inclusion criteria: original research articles, written in the English language, and relevant to CIN or cervical cancer diagnosis. For each, we extracted the sample size, AI architecture (e.g., convolutional neural networks, U-Net/DeepLab V3 + segmentation models, multimodal fusion networks), reference standard, and reported metrics (sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the curve). Results: Across multiple studies, AI systems demonstrated superior diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity, particularly for early detection of high-risk lesions and classification of cervical abnormalities. Deep-learning models, such as convolutional neural networks, consistently outperformed conventional methods by reducing diagnostic variability and offering robust performance even in low-resource settings. The review also highlights the potential of AI for real-time diagnostics and its capacity to support clinical decision-making via automated systems. Conclusion: AI has the potential to revolutionize cervical cancer diagnosis and management by enhancing the accuracy and efficiency of colposcopic evaluations. However, challenges remain, including the development of standardized datasets, validation in diverse populations, and ethical considerations surrounding data privacy and access to technology. Continued research and development are crucial to harness AI's global potential to improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.