ArticleOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2025
Strengthening intersectoral cooperation for control and integrated surveillance of rabies in Uganda: A multistakeholder engagement workshop.
Article in One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Fear of rabies and post-bite psychological stress: a qualitative study of YouTube comments from India.Tropical medicine and health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rabies is a prioritized zoonotic disease and significant public health threat in Uganda. Despite Uganda's commitment to the global "Zero-by-30" goal and a validated National Rabies Elimination Strategy (NRES), implementation has been hindered by fragmented surveillance, limited intersectoral coordination, and lack of operationalization of control plans. To address these challenges, a participatory multisectoral workshop was conducted by the Schnell Einsetzbare Expertengruppe Gesundheit and eRabies project team, in collaboration with Makerere University, the Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Industry and Fisheries (MAAIF), and the Ministry of Health (MOH). The workshop brought together 49 participants from national, subnational, and international institutions to strengthen intersectoral cooperation, assess NRES implementation, and define next immediate steps for rabies control. The primary output was a structured SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats) analysis of NRES implementation, across four thematic areas: Governance, Coordination, and Risk Communication; Rabies Prevention and Control; Field and Laboratory Surveillance and Data Management, and Training and Operational Research. Insights from the SWOT analysis informed a one-year log frame outlining 10 prioritized objectives and 26 targeted activities, each linked to success indicators and timelines. Early follow-up actions included piloting a digital application for integrated bite case management in four selected districts, specialized rabies diagnostic training, a national rabies research scoping review, and targeted mass dog vaccination campaigns. Despite these advancements, broader implementation of the plan remains inconsistent. Over a year later, activities such as vaccination coverage assessment, post-exposure prophylaxis procurement and distribution, and sustained community engagement have not progressed beyond planning or lack documentation. Sustained political commitment, dedicated financing, and strengthened coordination at both national and subnational levels are critical to overcome existing challenges and ensure initial momentum translates into lasting impact. The workshop outputs offer a practical, stakeholder-driven framework to guide national priorities, aligned with the NRES and goal of rabies elimination in Uganda.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.