SynthesisFrontiers in digital health2025
What are the functionalities and features of mobile health record apps supporting persons experiencing social exclusion? A systematic literature review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Research into mobile health record apps has focused on narrow outcomes, such as medication adherence for persons experiencing chronic conditions. However, no review has examined their use in the context of social exclusion. Persons experiencing social exclusion (PESE) face complex health needs, limited healthcare access, and increased exposure to traumatic life experiences. It is imperative to consider a trauma-informed and integrated care approaches when developing an app for them, and they should be involved as key stakeholders to ensure equitable care. This review examined these apps' functionalities and features that support PESE in relation to their reported outcomes and the delivery of a trauma-informed and/or integrated care. Methods: A systematic search of ten databases: Web of Science Core Collection, Medline, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Cochrane, Embase, Scopus, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses A&I, Lenus and OpenGrey International were undertaken, and was supplemented with non-indexed and grey literature. Searches were undertaken in April 2024 in English with no date limit, and used the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Studies were deemed eligible if they met the SPIDER framework criteria. Results: One thousand three hundred and thirty-two papers were found eligible for the review, of which eleven qualified for inclusion following screening and quality assessment using QATSDD and MMAT tools. Four themes were found (supporting integrated and connected care; enhancement of user engagement and care coordination; improving data accuracy and access to care; and provision of ongoing monitoring and feedback) related to apps' functionalities and features, which in turn were linked to reported outcomes. Although a few of these apps' functionalities and features were aligned with the six principles of trauma-informed care, none of them were implemented considering a trauma-informed care and/or integrated care. Conclusion: This review provided insights into the complexities of implementing a mobile health record app for PESE. However, limited available data restricted a comprehensive understanding of these apps' functionalities and features in their specific implementation settings in relation to their reported outcomes. Next steps include translating these findings into survey and interview questions to identify end-user requirements for developing an app for PESE from a trauma-informed perspective to promote integrated care. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42024535090.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.