Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41031099›Full record

ArticleERJ open research2025

Validation of artificial intelligence spirometry diagnostic support software in primary care: a blinded diagnostic accuracy study.

Anthony Sunjaya, George D Edwards, Jennifer Harvey, Karl Sylvester, Joanna Purvis, Matthew Rutter, Joanna Shakespeare, Vicky Moore, Ethaar El-Emir, Gillian Doe and 19 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ERJ open research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors.

Anthony SunjayaThe George Institute for Global Health, UNSW Sydney and Imperial College London, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2257-4374
George D EdwardsHarefield Respiratory Research Group, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Jennifer HarveyHarefield Respiratory Research Group, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Karl SylvesterRespiratory Physiology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6851-1219
Joanna PurvisCardio-Respiratory Department, George Eliot Hospital NHS Trust, Nuneaton, UK.
Matthew RutterRespiratory Physiology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Joanna ShakespeareDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK.
Vicky MooreRespiratory and Sleep Sciences, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK.
Ethaar El-EmirHarefield Respiratory Research Group, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Gillian DoeDepartment of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre Leicester - Respiratory, Leicester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4782-5811
Karolien Van OrshovenArtiQ NV, Leuven, Belgium.
Suhani PatelHarefield Respiratory Research Group, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Maarten de VosArtiQ NV, Leuven, Belgium.
Ahmed ElmahyArtiQ NV, Leuven, Belgium.
Benoit CuyversArtiQ NV, Leuven, Belgium.
Paul DesbordesArtiQ NV, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1521-7590
Satesh SehdevThe Confederation, Hillingdon Community Interest Company, London, UK.
Rachael A EvansDepartment of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre Leicester - Respiratory, Leicester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1667-868X
Michael D MorganWolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull and York Medical School, University of Hull, Cottingham, UK.
Richard RussellKing's Centre for Lung Health, Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, King's College London, London, UK.
Ian JarroldAsthma+Lung UK, London, UK.
Nannette SpainPatient and public involvement representative.
Stephanie TaylorWolfson Institution of Population Health, Queen Mary University, London, UK.
David A ScottSouthampton Health Technology Assessments Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
A Toby PrevostCicely Saunders Institute, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1723-0796
Nicholas S HopkinsonNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3235-0454
Samantha KonHarefield Respiratory Research Group, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Marko TopalovicArtiQ NV, Leuven, Belgium.
William D-C ManHarefield Respiratory Research Group, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3782-659X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective and design: The objective of the present study was to assess the discriminative accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI) software to identify COPD and other chronic respiratory diseases from primary care spirometry. This was a diagnostic study with blinded analysis. Methods: Retrospective hand-held spirometry data from consecutive patients attending primary care clinics in Hillingdon (London, UK) between September 2015 and March 2019 were used. The index diagnosis was the "preferred" diagnosis determined by AI software (highest probability) using supervised random-forest machine learning to interpret raw spirometry data and basic demographics. The reference diagnosis was based on the consensus of expert pulmonologists with access to primary and secondary care medical notes and results of relevant investigations. Cross-tabulation of the index test results by the results of the reference standard for COPD and other respiratory disease categories provided the main outcome measures. Results: In this primary care spirometry dataset from 1113 patients, 543 (48.8%) had a reference diagnosis of COPD. AI preferred diagnosis detected 456, achieving a sensitivity of 84.0% (95% CI 80.6-87.0%), specificity of 86.8% (83.8-89.5%), accuracy of 85.4% (83.2-87.5%) with area under curve (AUC) of 0.914 (0.896-0.930). AI preferred diagnosis identified 187 out of 249 patients with reference diagnosis of interstitial lung disease and 59 out of 107 patients with asthma, with AUCs of 0.900 (0.880-0.916) and 0.814 (0.790-0.836), respectively. Conclusion: AI software achieved high sensitivity and specificity in identifying COPD using spirometry and basic demographic data and may support accurate diagnosis of COPD in primary care. AI software performed less well for other chronic respiratory disease categories.

Identifiers

PMID41031099
PMCPMC12477482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.