Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41031057›Full record

ArticleSAGE open medical case reports2025

Ethical challenges in treating family members: A case study on confidentiality and clinical decision-making in the Indian context.

Mohamed Ali Kalathingal, Nazia Edathola Kottasseri, Jasim Uluvan, Shajitha Thekke Veettil

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in SAGE open medical case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mohamed Ali KalathingalFamily Medicine Clerkship Office, Primary Health Care Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Nazia Edathola KottasseriQatar University Health Centre, Primary Health Care Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Jasim UluvanDepartment of Medicine, Relief Hospital, Kondotty, Kerala, India.
Shajitha Thekke VeettilDepartment of Clinical Research, Primary Health Care Corporation, Doha, Qatar.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6322-4808

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This case report explores the ethical complexities faced by physicians when providing medical advice and care to close family members. It focuses on a 29-year-old Indian woman residing in Western Europe who, while visiting family in Kerala, India, was diagnosed with IgA nephropathy during a routine health check. Several family members involved in her care are also practicing physicians, raising significant ethical questions about confidentiality, professional objectivity, and the boundaries of familial care. The case highlights the tension between patient autonomy and informal medical involvement by relatives, especially in a country such as India, where cultural expectations encourage familial responsibility. Although clinical care was efficiently delivered, the situation raised concerns about the formal decision-making process, the lack of clinical documentation, and the absence of established ethical frameworks within the Indian healthcare context. This report emphasizes the need for clearer guidelines and practical tools to help physicians navigate dual-role relationships while upholding confidentiality and clinical integrity. The patient's perspective and the follow-up are discussed, with implications for both policy and practice.

Indexed as

confidentialitydual-role conflictfamily careIgA nephropathyIndian healthcarephysician ethics

Identifiers

PMID41031057
PMCPMC12477383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.