ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Evaluation of Alphafold modeling for elucidation of nanobody-peptide epitope interactions.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Models of Ab-antigen complexes can be used to understand interaction mechanisms and for improving affinity. This study evaluates the use of the protein structure prediction algorithm AlphaFold (AF) for exploration of interactions between peptide epitope tags and the smallest functional antibody fragments, nanobodies (Nbs). Although past studies of AF for modeling antibody-target (antigen) interactions suggested modest algorithm performance, those were primarily focused on Ab-protein interactions, while the performance and utility of AF for Nb-peptide interactions, which are generally less complex due to smaller antigens, smaller binding domains, and fewer chains, is less clear. In this study we evaluated the performance of AF for predicting the structures of Nbs bound to experimentally validated, linear, short peptide epitopes (Nb-tag pairs). We expanded the pool of experimental data available for comparison through crystallization and structural determination of a previously reported Nb-tag complex (Nb127). Models of Nb-tag pair structures generated from AF were variable with respect to consistency with experimental data, with good performance in just over half (4 out of 6) of cases. Even among Nb-tag pairs successfully modeled in isolation, efforts to translate modeling to more complex contexts failed, suggesting an underappreciated role of the size and complexity of inputs in AF modeling success. Finally, the model of a Nb-tag pair with minimal previous characterization was used to guide the design of a peptide-electrophile conjugate that undergoes covalent crosslinking with Nb upon binding. These findings highlight the utility of minimized antibody and antigen structures to maximize insights from AF modeling.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.