Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41030940›Full record

ArticleCampbell systematic reviews2025

Protocol: Strategies to Enhance Inclusion in Informed Consent Practice for People With Vision and/or Hearing Support Needs: A Systematic Review.

Fleur O'Hare, Sujani Thrimawithana, Aimee Clague, Eden G Robertson, David Foran, Caroline Ondracek, Camille Paynter, Tessa Saunders, Lauren N Ayton

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Campbell systematic reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Fleur O'HareDepartment of Optometry and Vision Sciences, Melbourne School of Health Sciences University of Melbourne Melbourne Victoria Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0022-0527
Sujani ThrimawithanaDepartment of Optometry and Vision Sciences, Melbourne School of Health Sciences University of Melbourne Melbourne Victoria Australia.
Aimee ClagueUniversity Library University of Melbourne Melbourne Victoria Australia.
Eden G RobertsonDiscipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, School of Clinical Medicine UNSW Medicine & Health, UNSW Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia.
David ForanEqualus Advisory Noosa Heads Queensland Australia.
Caroline OndracekLibrary Services Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne Melbourne Victoria Australia.
Camille PaynterDepartment of Audiology and Speech Pathology, Melbourne School of Health Sciences University of Melbourne Melbourne Victoria Australia.
Tessa SaundersEvaluation and Implementation Science Unit, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health University of Melbourne Melbourne Victoria Australia.
Lauren N AytonDepartment of Optometry and Vision Sciences, Melbourne School of Health Sciences University of Melbourne Melbourne Victoria Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An equitable and accessible informed consent process is needed to support agency and mutual decision-making. This systematic review aims to gather and characterise the evidence supporting methods that enhance inclusion and accessibility in informed consent practice for people with vision and/or hearing support needs. It will address the research question: what strategies are being used to enhance inclusive consent practice for people with vision impairment, people who are d/Deaf or hard of hearing, and people who are d/Deafblind. Additionally, the review aims to generate recommendations to facilitate the uptake of accessibility practices within informed consent procedures. This systematic review will build on current evidence for the positive impact of intentional actions to support accessible communication and information exchange. It may guide future work on intervention development and primary research in improving equity in clinical care and research.

Identifiers

PMID41030940
PMCPMC12477491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.