ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Pathway-specific genomic alterations in pancreatic cancer across diverse cohorts.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Pancreatic cancer (PC) is an aggressive malignancy with rising incidence and poor survival rates. While Hispanic/Latino (H/L) patients have a lower overall incidence compared to Non-Hispanic White (NHW) patients, they are diagnosed at younger ages, often present with more advanced disease, and experience worse survival outcomes. The molecular drivers underlying these disparities remain poorly understood. Key oncogenic pathways, including TP53, WNT, PI3K, TGF-Beta, and RTK/RAS, play crucial roles in tumor progression, therapy resistance, and response to targeted treatments. However, their ethnicity-specific alterations and prognostic implications in PC remain largely unexplored. This study aims to characterize pathway-specific mutations in PC among H/L and NHW patients, assess tumor mutation burden, and identify ethnicity-specific oncogenic drivers using publicly available datasets. The findings may provide critical insights to optimize precision medicine strategies and enhance targeted therapies for underrepresented populations. Methods: A bioinformatics analysis was performed using publicly available PC datasets to evaluate mutation frequencies in genes associated with the TGF-Beta, RTK/RAS, WNT, PI3K, and TP53 pathways. The study included 4,248 patients, with 407 identified as H/L and 3,841 as NHW. Patients were stratified by ethnicity to assess differences in mutation prevalence. Chi-squared tests were conducted to compare mutation rates between groups, while Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to evaluate overall survival differences based on pathway-specific alterations. Results: Significant differences were observed in the TGF-Beta pathway between H/L and NHW patients. TGF-Beta mutations were less prevalent in H/L patients (18.4% vs. 24.4%, p = 8.6e-3). Additionally, genes related to the TGF-Beta pathway showed significant alterations, with SMAD2 (1.5% vs. 0.4%, p = 6.3e-3) and SMAD4 (15% vs. 19.9%, p = 0.02) exhibiting notable differences. Although RTK/RAS, WNT, PI3K, and TP53 pathway mutations were not statistically significant overall, borderline significance was observed in genes associated with these pathways, including ERBB4 (3.4% vs. 1.8%, p = 0.03), ALK (2.7% vs. 1.1%, p = 0.01), HRAS (1.2% vs. 0.1%, p = 1.3e-4), and RIT1 (0.7% vs. 0.1%, p = 0.03) in the RTK/RAS pathway, as well as CTNNB1 (2.9% vs. 1.3%, p = 0.01) in the WNT pathway. Survival analysis revealed no significant differences in overall survival among H/L patients. However, NHW patients with TP53 pathway alterations exhibited borderline significant differences in survival outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.