ArticleJAMIA open2025
Developing a real-time registry to track breast cancer patients across the city of Boston.
Article in JAMIA open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Patient navigation is designed to identify and address patients' needs throughout their cancer treatment. In the context of a clinical trial designed to deliver a standardized patient navigation protocol, a registry was needed to allow users from across multiple health systems to input patient data, track navigation outreach, and coordinate cancer care in real time. To design a registry to allow patient navigators (PNs) at 6 medical centers across 4 health systems to track breast cancer patients determined to be most at risk for delays in treatment. Materials and Methods: A multi-disciplinary team chose REDCap to host the registry. The aim was to develop a platform that would (1) manage a caseload of patients who are most vulnerable for delays; (2) track patients through the continuum of cancer care in real time; (3) allow PNs to prioritize certain patients; (4) facilitate inter-system communication; and (5) allow the research team to monitor navigators' activities (in context of a research study, for supervision and feedback). Results: The registry was built through collaboration with clinical providers, PNs, informatics specialists, and expert developers from the REDCap team, using the software standard features and incorporating additional functionality using SAS programming. Conclusion: REDCap provided an accessible and modifiable platform for hosting a registry to track patients in real time. However, it did not streamline PNs' workflows or reduce data entry burdens as intended. A major barrier was the lack of interoperability with pre-existing systems navigators use, which led to redundancy and increased the burden of documentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.