Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41030920›Full record

ArticleJAMIA open2025

Developing a real-time registry to track breast cancer patients across the city of Boston.

Amy M LeClair, Clara A Chen, Marisa L Mizzoni, William G Adams, William F Harvey, Christopher W Shanahan, Jennifer S Haas, Stephenie C Lemon, Tracy Battaglia, Karen M Freund

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMIA open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Amy M LeClairDepartment of Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA 02111, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5333-1813
Clara A ChenBiostatistics and Epidemiology Data Analytics Center, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02118, United States.
Marisa L MizzoniDepartment of Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA 02111, United States.
William G AdamsEvans Department of Medicine, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02118, United States.
William F HarveyDepartment of Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA 02111, United States.
Christopher W ShanahanEvans Department of Medicine, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02118, United States.
Jennifer S HaasDivision of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, United States.
Stephenie C LemonDepartment of Preventive & Behavioral Medicine, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA 01655, United States.
Tracy BattagliaEvans Department of Medicine, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02118, United States.
Karen M FreundDepartment of Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA 02111, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Patient navigation is designed to identify and address patients' needs throughout their cancer treatment. In the context of a clinical trial designed to deliver a standardized patient navigation protocol, a registry was needed to allow users from across multiple health systems to input patient data, track navigation outreach, and coordinate cancer care in real time. To design a registry to allow patient navigators (PNs) at 6 medical centers across 4 health systems to track breast cancer patients determined to be most at risk for delays in treatment. Materials and Methods: A multi-disciplinary team chose REDCap to host the registry. The aim was to develop a platform that would (1) manage a caseload of patients who are most vulnerable for delays; (2) track patients through the continuum of cancer care in real time; (3) allow PNs to prioritize certain patients; (4) facilitate inter-system communication; and (5) allow the research team to monitor navigators' activities (in context of a research study, for supervision and feedback). Results: The registry was built through collaboration with clinical providers, PNs, informatics specialists, and expert developers from the REDCap team, using the software standard features and incorporating additional functionality using SAS programming. Conclusion: REDCap provided an accessible and modifiable platform for hosting a registry to track patients in real time. However, it did not streamline PNs' workflows or reduce data entry burdens as intended. A major barrier was the lack of interoperability with pre-existing systems navigators use, which led to redundancy and increased the burden of documentation.

Indexed as

breast cancerdisparitiesREDCapregistry

Identifiers

PMID41030920
PMCPMC12478474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.