ArticleProceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems2024
Prediction of MRI-Induced Power Absorption in Patients with DBS Leads.
Article in Proceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The interaction between deep brain stimulation (DBS) systems and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can induce tissue heating in patients. While electromagnetic (EM) simulations can be used to estimate the specific absorption rate (SAR) values in the presence of an implanted DBS system, they are computationally expensive. To address this drawback, we predict local SAR values in the tips of DBS leads with machine learning based efficient algorithms, specifically XgBoost and deep learning. We significantly outperformed the previous state of the art, and adapted new machine learning models based on Residual Networks family as well as XgBoost models. We observed that already extracted limited features are better suited for ensemble learning via XgBoost than deep networks due the small-data regime. Although we conclude that boosting gradient algorithm is more suitable for this non-linear regression problem due to structured nature of the data and small data regime, we found that width plays a more critical role than depth in network design and it has a strong potential for future research. Our experimental results, using a dataset of 260 instances that are patient-derived and artificial, reached an outstanding RMSE of 17.8 W/kg with XgBoost, 78 W/kg with deep networks, given that the previous study on this problem reached a state-of-the-art root mean square error value (RMSE) of 168 W/kg.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.