ArticleAustralasian journal of ultrasound in medicine2025
Influence of Complex Disease on the Accuracy of Transvaginal Ultrasound Diagnosis of Uterosacral Ligament Endometriosis.
Article in Australasian journal of ultrasound in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Influence of Complex Disease on the Accuracy of Transvaginal Ultrasound Diagnosis of Uterosacral Ligament Endometriosis.Australasian journal of ultrasound in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To assess the impact of complex disease states, including pouch of Douglas (POD) obliteration and deep endometriosis (DE) of the bowel, on the diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) for detecting endometriosis of the uterosacral ligaments (USLs) and torus uterinus (TU). Methods: This diagnostic accuracy study evaluated the performance of TVUS in diagnosing DE of the USLs and TU, using laparoscopic visualisation with histological confirmation as the reference standard among two previously reported prospectively collected cohorts. Complex disease states were defined as complete POD obliteration and/or DE of the bowel. Diagnostic accuracy metrics, including sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV) and likelihood ratios (LR), were calculated before and after the exclusion of complex disease cases. Results: Among 177 participants, 18.6% (33/177) had POD obliteration, 18.6% (33/177) had DE of the bowel and 16.4% (29/177) had both. Accuracy ranged from 93.1% to 94.7% for USLs and 97.2%-98.5% for TU, with minimal change after exclusion (≤ 1.5%). Sensitivity declined following exclusion, by -6.4% (left USL), -3.5% (right USL) and -2.7% (TU) after POD obliteration exclusion and further decreases of -1.8%, -3.4% and -4.4%, respectively, after bowel DE exclusion. Specificity remained ≥ 97.8% across all sites and reached 100% at the USLs after POD obliteration exclusion. Conclusions: Contrary to the assumption that complex disease states hinder TVUS accuracy, their presence may enhance lesion recognition, likely due to increased sonographic attentiveness when severe disease is suspected. While TVUS remains highly specific, its sensitivity decreases in the absence of complex disease, emphasising the need for meticulous and systematic imaging approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.