Trial reportFrontiers in endocrinology2025
Effect of rhPTH(1-34) and alendronate on the treatment of type 2 diabetic bone disease.
Trial report in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) have decreased bone turnover levels. However, there are few studies comparing the anti-osteoporosis effects of anabolic drugs and anti-resorptive drugs in patients with T2DM. Thus, this study was designed to compare the changes in bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover levels in mice and postmenopausal osteoporotic patients, both with and without T2DM, following treatment with rhPTH(1-34) or alendronate (ALN). Methods: In the animal study, the mouse model of T2DM (DM mice) was established by high-fat diet (60% from fat) feeding and streptozotocin injection (100 mg/kg) in C57BL/6 mice. Both DM and control (CON) mice were then randomly assigned to receive either normal saline, rhPTH or ALN treatment. In the clinical study, a single-center, prospective, open-label, randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted. Postmenopausal patients with osteoporosis (OP) and postmenopausal patients with both osteoporosis and type 2 diabetes (DOP) were recruited and randomly assigned to receive either rhPTH(1-34) or ALN treatment for a period of one year. Changes in BMD and bone turnover levels were assessed in all groups. Results: Compared to CON mice, DM mice exhibited decreased bone mass, impaired bone microstructure and, decreased levels of bone turnover markers, including procollagen type I intact N-terminal (P1NP) and C terminal cross-linking telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX). rhPTH(1-34) could reverse the low bone turnover observed in DM mice and had a better effect on improving BMD, bone volume per tissue volume (BV/TV), trabecular number in femoral trabecular bone, as well as BMD, BV/TV, and trabecular thickness in lumbar trabecular bone. In the clinical trial, at baseline, patients with DOP also exhibited decreased levels of bone turnover markers, including P1NP, CTX and osteocalcin. For patients with DOP, rhPTH(1-34) had a better effect than ALN on BMD improvement at the lumbar spine. Notably, the effect of ALN on lumbar spine improvement in patients with DOP was even smaller than that in patients with OP alone. Conclusion: Initiating treatment with rhPTH(1-34) may provide greater clinical benefits to patients with diabetic bone disease characterized by low bone turnover levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.