Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41030829›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology science2026

Can Multimodal Large Language Models Diagnose Diabetic Retinopathy from Fundus Photos? A Quantitative Evaluation.

Jesse A Most, Evan H Walker, Nehal N Mehta, Ines D Nagel, Jimmy S Chen, Jonathan F Russell, Nathan L Scott, Shyamanga Borooah

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jesse A MostJacobs Retina Center, Shiley Eye Institute, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Evan H WalkerViterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology and Shiley Eye Institute, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Nehal N MehtaJacobs Retina Center, Shiley Eye Institute, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Ines D NagelJacobs Retina Center, Shiley Eye Institute, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Jimmy S ChenViterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology and Shiley Eye Institute, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Jonathan F RussellDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa.
Nathan L ScottJacobs Retina Center, Shiley Eye Institute, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Shyamanga BorooahJacobs Retina Center, Shiley Eye Institute, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of 4 multimodal large language models (MLLMs) in detecting and grading diabetic retinopathy (DR) using their new image analysis features. Design: A single-center retrospective study. Subjects: Patients diagnosed with prediabetes and diabetes. Methods: Ultra-widefield fundus images from patients seen at the University of California, San Diego, were graded for DR severity by 3 retina specialists using the ETDRS classification system to establish ground truth. Four MLLMs (ChatGPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, Google Gemini 1.5 Pro, and Perplexity Llama 3.1 Sonar/Default) were tested using 4 distinct prompts. These assessed multiple-choice disease diagnosis, binary disease classification, and disease severity. Multimodal large language models were assessed for accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity in identifying the presence or absence of DR and relative disease severity. Main Outcome Measures: Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of diagnosis. Results: A total of 309 eyes from 188 patients were included in the study. The average patient age was 58.7 (56.7-60.7) years, with 55.3% being female. After specialist grading, 70.2% of eyes had DR of varying severity, and 29.8% had no DR. For disease identification with multiple choices provided, Claude and ChatGPT scored significantly higher ( Conclusions: Multimodal large language models are powerful tools that may eventually assist retinal image analysis. Currently, however, there is variability in the accuracy of image analysis, and diagnostic performance falls short of clinical standards for safe implementation in DR diagnosis and grading. Further training and optimization of common errors may enhance their clinical utility. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceDiabetic retinopathyImage analysisMultimodal large language modelUltra-widefield fundus photography

Identifiers

PMID41030829
PMCPMC12478077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.