ArticleJournal of pain research2025
The Optimal Patient Profile and Appropriate Role of Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) for Patients with Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome-Type 1 (PSPS-T1) Not Suitable for Spine Surgery: A European Modified Delphi Consensus.
Article in Journal of pain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Chronic lower back pain (CLBP) is a debilitating condition, and a leading cause of disability associated with significant negative impacts on patients' quality of life (QoL) and mental health. In both Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome Types 1 and 2 (PSPS-T1/2) patients, spinal cord stimulation (SCS) therapy has shown favorable outcomes including improved QoL and patient satisfaction, reductions in opioid use, and an acceptable safety profile. This consensus aimed to define the PSPS-T1 patient profile for SCS to maximize its benefits in clinical settings and allow budget holders to quantify the patient population and allocate budget accordingly. Methods: This study used a modified Delphi methodology. A literature review was conducted, followed by multidisciplinary steering group discussions that resulted in the development of 32 statements under five key domains. These statements, along with a four-point Likert scale, were incorporated into a survey distributed across seven European countries to 144 healthcare professionals experienced in pain management. The respondents included orthopedic surgeons (n=50), pain specialists (n=48), and neurosurgeons (n=46). The consensus agreement threshold was set at 75%. Results: Consensus was achieved for 30 of the 32 statements, with 11 statements (34%) reaching ≥90% agreement. Two statements did not achieve consensus. Based on the consensus achieved in the study, an algorithm is proposed to assist in patient selection for SCS. Conclusion: This consensus provides recommendations on optimal patient profiles, referral processes, diagnostic procedures, and a decision-making algorithm for PSPS-T1 patients who are ineligible for spine surgery in Europe.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.