Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41030703›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Clinical Experience With Preventing Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia in Breast Cancer Patients With Different Timings of Pegylated Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (PEG-G-CSF) Injection: A Case Series.

Yohei Tominaga, Koji Furukawa

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yohei TominagaDepartment of Thoracic and Breast Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki, JPN.
Koji FurukawaDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki, JPN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pegfilgrastim (pegylated granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, PEG-G-CSF) is commonly used as prophylaxis for febrile neutropenia (FN) in high-risk chemotherapy regimens for breast cancer. However, the optimal timing of PEG-G-CSF injections has not been established, despite several investigations into the subject. In this study, patients received epirubicin-based breast cancer chemotherapy and underwent routine blood tests on days seven or eight of initial chemotherapy to assess the risk of FN. Four patients experienced significant decreases in white blood cell (WBC) and neutrophil (NE) counts. To maintain patient safety and relative dose intensity (RDI), the dose was reduced in the second cycle, and PEG-G-CSF administration was moved from day three to day four, as administering PEG-G-CSF within 24 hours to prevent FN is thought to be ineffective. This theory is based on the fact that the WBC and NE expanded by PEG-G-CSF were killed by the remaining chemotherapy. Therefore, we hypothesized that in the next second cycle, administering PEG-G-CSF one day later (day four) after chemotherapy might be effective for these patients. Furthermore, for patients whose blood tests on days seven or eight of the second cycle showed an increase in WBC and NE counts, the chemotherapy dose was increased in the third cycle. Patients with breast cancer (age range: 41-71 years) were assigned to receive PEG-G-CSF on day three or four of a three-week epirubicin and cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy regimen (dose-dense epirubicin and cyclophosphamide; 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide; or basic epirubicin and cyclophosphamide) using heterochronic timing. We then compared WBC and NE counts in the same individuals over time. In all four cases, WBC and NE counts on day seven or eight were much greater with PEG-G-CSF injection on day four than with injection on day three. As per heterochronic follow-up, which has not been reported previously, day four injection of PEG-G-CSF appears more effective than day three injection for preventing neutropenia. However, due to the small number of cases in this series and the confounding factor of the chemotherapy dose in the third cycle being approximately 8% less than that in the first cycle in Case 2, it is difficult to generalize our findings. Hence, future studies with a longitudinal follow-up involving a larger number of cases are required.

Indexed as

breast cancer chemotherapyfibrile neutropeniagranulocyte colony-stimulating factor (g-csf)heterochronic follow-upoptimal timing

Identifiers

PMID41030703
PMCPMC12476973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.