ReviewCureus2025
Beta-Blockers in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Managing Atrial Fibrillation in Heart Failure: In Whom, When, and How?International journal of heart failure · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) remains a significant global health burden, with beta-blockers serving as a cornerstone therapy due to their ability to modulate neurohormonal activation and improve outcomes. However, their efficacy in post-myocardial infarction (MI) patients with preserved ejection fraction (EF) remains debated. This systematic review evaluates the clinical effects of beta-blockers in HFrEF and post-MI populations to clarify their role across different patient phenotypes. Eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were systematically reviewed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Eligible studies assessed beta-blockers in HFrEF or post-MI patients, reporting outcomes such as mortality, hospitalizations, or changes in EF. Data were extracted independently by two reviewers, and risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool. A narrative synthesis was performed due to heterogeneity in study designs and interventions. Beta-blockers demonstrated significant reductions in all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalizations in chronic HFrEF patients. In contrast, they showed neutral effects on mortality and cardiovascular outcomes in post-MI patients with preserved EF. Safety profiles were favorable, with no excess adverse events. Methodological quality was high, with most trials rated as low risk of bias. Beta-blockers are highly effective in HFrEF but offer limited benefits in post-MI patients with preserved EF. These findings support phenotype-specific therapy, reinforcing guideline recommendations for HFrEF while questioning routine use in preserved EF post-MI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.