Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41030655›Full record

ArticleData in brief2025

HRI-confusion: A multimodal dataset for modelling and detecting user confusion in situated human-robot interaction.

Na Li, Jane Courtney, Robert Ross

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Data in brief, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Na LiSchool of Computer Science, Technological University Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Jane CourtneySchool of Electrical & Electronic Engineering, Technological University Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Robert RossSchool of Computer Science, Technological University Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The dataset was collected from 28 participants (17 female, 9 male, and 1 non-binary) for a study aimed at modelling and detecting user social behaviours with different confusion states in task-oriented situated human-robot interaction (HRI). The dataset consists of user facial body video recordings synchronised with user speech across three designed experiment scenarios (Tasks 1 - 3). Each experiment lasted approximately one hour per participant. The videos are segmented into individual clips corresponding to specific experimental conversations under predefined conditions: general confusion and non-confusion for Task 1 and 3; and productive confusion, unproductive confusion, and non-confusion for Task 2. In total, the dataset contains 789 video clips (body: 392, face: 397). Each video is recorded in high-definition RGB format, capturing user facial expressions or body language along with their speech. These multimodal data provide a valuable resource for studying user cognitive and mental states in human-robot interaction and human-computer interaction. The data collected for Task 2 was used in [9]. In compliance with GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation) and DPIA (data protection impact assessment) guidelines, the dataset is freely available upon request at https://sites.google.com/view/hridatarequst/home.

Indexed as

ConfusionHuman-robot interactionMultimodal dataUser social behaviours

Identifiers

PMID41030655
PMCPMC12478088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.