Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41030652›Full record

ArticleJHEP reports : innovation in hepatology2025

Randomized phase II study comparing two doses of regorafenib in second-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

Keisuke Koroki, Sadahisa Ogasawara, Sae Yumita, Miyuki Nakagawa, Hiroaki Kanzaki, Kazufumi Kobayashi, Masanori Inoue, Masato Nakamura, Naoya Kanogawa, Takayuki Kondo and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Keisuke KorokiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Sadahisa OgasawaraDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Sae YumitaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Miyuki NakagawaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Hiroaki KanzakiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Kazufumi KobayashiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Masanori InoueDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Masato NakamuraDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Naoya KanogawaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Takayuki KondoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Eiichiro SuzukiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Yoshihiko OokaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Shingo NakamotoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Yuki ShikoClinical Research Center, Chiba University Hospital, Chiba, Japan.
Yoshihito OzawaClinical Research Center, Chiba University Hospital, Chiba, Japan.
Yosuke InabaClinical Research Center, Chiba University Hospital, Chiba, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background & Aims: The RESORCE trial confirmed regorafenib as a second-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients who tolerated sorafenib. However, its safety and efficacy in patients with diverse treatment histories remain unknown. The REGAIN study sought to assess regorafenib in patients not included in the RESORCE trial. Methods: This single-center, randomized, open-label, dose-comparison trial included patients with HCC who had previously received sorafenib 200 mg/day or 400 mg every other day (Arm A), lenvatinib (Arm B), or atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Arm C). Patients were randomly assigned to receive regorafenib at the standard (160 mg/day) or reduced (80 mg/day) starting dose. For early safety assessment, discontinuation as the result of adverse events (AEs) during the first cycle among the first six patients in each dose group was defined as a measure of evaluation. The primary endpoint was time to progression (TTP), and efficacy was evaluated using mRECIST. Results: Thirty-six patients were enrolled (12 per arm). Although the study did not reach its originally planned sample size, it provided safety and exploratory efficacy data. Discontinuation in the first cycle as a result of AEs was observed in one patient (Arm C, standard-dose group). The efficacy outcomes were comparable between the standard- and reduced-dose groups: median TTP was 4.6 Conclusions: Regorafenib can be safely administered with varying treatment histories. Further investigation is warranted to validate the clinical utility of reduced starting dose, which may optimize treatment strategies for advanced HCC in real-world settings. Impact and implications: Sequencing and extending systemic therapies can improve the prognosis of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but comprehensive evidence on second-line and subsequent treatments remains limited. This study evaluated regorafenib in modern clinical scenarios, including patients intolerant to sorafenib and those previously treated with lenvatinib or atezolizumab plus bevacizumab. Regorafenib was safely administered at 160 mg/day and 80 mg/day, and an exploratory efficacy analysis found no significant difference between the two starting doses. These findings support the integration of regorafenib into personalized treatment strategies for advanced HCC, providing physicians specializing in liver cancer treatment with greater flexibility in selecting appropriate therapeutic sequences while also expanding treatment options for patients facing increasingly limited systemic therapy choices. Clinical Trials Registration: jRCTs031190103.

Indexed as

Hepatocellular carcinomaRandomized controlled trialRegorafenibRESORCE trial

Identifiers

PMID41030652
PMCPMC12478257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.