Guideline-enhanced large language models outperform physician-test takers on EASL Campus quizzes multiple choice questions.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Exploring large language models as a prescription decision support tool for rational antibiotic use: A dual-framework analysis using standardized examinations and real-world clinical cases.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2026
   Article
2. PHENO-RAG: An artificial intelligence tool for guideline-informed management decisions in hepatocellular carcinoma.JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology · 2026
   Article
3. From Guidelines to Real-Time Conversation: Expert-Validated Retrieval-Augmented and Fine-Tuned GPT-4 for Hepatitis C Management.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2025
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.