ArticleFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2025
Assessing assistive technology needs, unmet demands, barriers, and gaps in the Indian population: a protocol for large epidemiological survey.
Article in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- A multidimensional classification of assistive technology for health system integration.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Institutionalization of assistive health technology in India: establishment of a national centre within the IIT-AIIMS ecosystem.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2026Article
- Global practices in AT provision: considerations for a national assistive technology policy for health in India.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Despite the critical role of assistive technologies (AT) in supporting individuals with functional impairments, there is limited information on AT needs and barriers across India's diverse regions. To fill this gap, we have designed a detailed survey protocol to gather nationally representative data on AT need, unmet need and satisfaction. Methods: A cross-sectional survey of 180,000 individuals (30,000 per region) across six regions i.e., North, South, East, West, Central, and North-East India will be conduct. Districts will be purposively selected to capture geographic diversity and institutional capacity; within each selected district, villages and urban wards will be chosen with probability proportional to size and households will then be selected by systematic random sampling. All members of each sampled household will be interviewed with the digital WHO Rapid Assistive Technology Assessment (rATA) tool, after staff complete standard training program; data quality will be ensured through real-time database checks, supervisory cross-checks, and monthly audits by the ICMR coordinating team. Analysis: We will estimate prevalence of AT need, unmet need, and satisfaction with 95 percent confidence intervals using univariate and multivariate logistic regression to identify associated factors. Sampling weights and sensitivity analyses will adjust and compare estimates. Discussion: This protocol describes the largest AT needs survey ever conducted in South-East Asia. The data generated will provide crucial evidence to guide India's national AT strategy. By sharing our detailed methodology, we aim to offer a practical framework that other low and middle-income countries can adapt to assess and enhance their own AT services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.