ArticleWorld journal of oncology2025
A Comparison of Bidirectional Stratafix Continuous Suture Versus Conventional Interrupted Suture in Breast Mastectomy.
Article in World journal of oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy of laparoscopic barbed sutures in the repair of gastroduodenal perforations: a meta-analysis.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to compare surgical outcomes between Stratafix barbed sutures and conventional sutures in patients undergoing total mastectomy for breast cancer. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed patients who underwent total mastectomy and/or axillary lymph node dissection at our hospital. Results: A total of 29 patients were included. No significant differences were observed in clinicopathological features between the two groups. However, the percentage of suturing time within the total operative time was significantly lower in the Stratafix group compared to conventional group (10% vs. 8%). In addition, the suturing time per centimeter was also significantly shorter with Stratafix group (P < 0.001). No wound-related complications were observed in either group during at least 3 months of follow-up. Conclusions: The use of barbed sutures for wound closure in mastectomy procedures effectively reduces suturing time without increasing the incidence of wound complications. Bidirectional Stratafix barbed sutures offer an improved and efficient alternative to conventional sutures for breast surgeons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.