Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41030623›Full record

ReviewThe Yale journal of biology and medicine2025

Architecture of Neurology: Establishment of the Montreal Neurological Institute as a Transnational History.

Uğurgül Tunç

Abstract readHistorical ArticleReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Yale journal of biology and medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Uğurgül TunçDepartment of Social Studies of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) is often framed as a triumph of North American medical innovation, an institution converging research, clinical care, and neurosurgery under the leadership of Wilder Penfield. Such narratives fail to account for Penfield's emotional labor and the networks of expertise that shaped the MNI. Using primary sources that reveal the transnational influences embedded in its design, this paper interrogates the foundation and evolution of the MNI particularly by looking at the early years of Penfield's career. It situates the MNI within the broader historiographies of medical space and scientific mobility drawing from Penfield's letters to illustrate the early influences that led to the establishment of the MNI. It proposes that history of emotions and history of mentalities can be effective methodologies to understand the diverse medical research communities of the early 20th century. Using his letters to his mother, Jean Jefferson Penfield, this paper interprets the emotional states of a young, self-doubting Penfield within a network of renowned neurologists of that period. In a wider context, through the case study of the MNI, this paper demonstrates that international collaboration and the physical mobility of researchers - as in the example of the American-born Penfield's global journey in search of knowledge and his path to becoming a naturalized citizen of Canada - are essential for the advancement of scientific research.

Indexed as

Academies and InstitutesNeurologyHistory, 20th CenturyHumansarchitecture of neurological institutesCajal Institutehealthcare architecturehealthcare designhistory of emotionshistory of neurologyhospital historyMontreal Neurological InstituteOtfrid FoersterPío del Río HortegaRamón y CajalRockefeller Foundationscientific mobilitytransnationalismWilder Penfield

Identifiers

PMID41030623
PMCPMC12466297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.