ArticleSage open pediatrics
Assessing Caregiver Satisfaction and Preferences in Pediatric Radiology: A Study on Communication and Safety Concerns.
Article in Sage open pediatrics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This cross-sectional study aimed to investigate the satisfaction and preferences of caregivers regarding communication about radiological safety. Methods: Data were collected in major Palestinian hospitals via a questionnaire that explored participants' satisfaction with the information provided and the quality of communication by referring physicians. Results: The final sample consisted of 282 caregivers. Most caregivers demonstrated high satisfaction with the adequacy of information regarding the indication for radiological testing (92.2%), but they were not satisfied with the information about radiation dose (56.8%). The majority were satisfied with the mutual discussions (90.8%), previous radiological tests (62.6%), and radiological information about the indicated examination (76.2%). Conclusions: The quality of communication was inadequate. While most caregivers preferred receiving verbal and written information from providers, some preferred other sources of information, such as digital media. Interventions should use educational courses and develop policies to address communication problems regarding radiological safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.