ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025
The Thoracoepigastric Flap: An Effective Reconstructive Method for Large Upper Extremity Defects in Low- and Middle-income Countries-A Single-center Study.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Injury to the upper limbs, among the most injured anatomical regions of the body, often results in the loss of the skin envelope and the exposure of vital structures, including bone and neurovascular bundles. Reconstructive options in resource-constrained environments are curtailed by both equipment and skilled manpower, necessitating avoidance of resource-intensive techniques. Thoracoepigastric flap (TEF) reconstructions of the forearm, wrist, and hand are simple to perform, provide a sizeable versatile integument cover, and avoid the hygiene and edema complications associated with classic groin flaps in these settings. Methods: Patients receiving upper extremity reconstruction with TEFs after upper extremity trauma by a single surgeon at our resource-limited tertiary care center were analyzed retrospectively. Patient demographics, mechanism of injury, surgical indication, and postoperative complications were collected. Results: Between 2011 and 2024, 42 patients, with a mean age of 31 years, underwent TEF reconstruction of upper extremity soft-tissue defects. Most patients in our cohort who had extensive soft tissue loss on an average had 5.3 visits to the operating theater and an average length of stay of 23 days. Defect and flap sizes were not uniformly available from patient charts and were therefore not analyzed. The commonest complication was flap tip necrosis requiring skin grafts in 2 patients. Conclusions: When raised as double flaps, TEFs are particularly advantageous in low- and middle-income countries because they do not require microsurgical skill, provide extensive coverage for large trauma-related defects, and offer a reliable option for limb reconstruction, especially in settings where follow-up care may be uncertain.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.