ArticleSleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society2025
Challenges and methodological considerations for research on the role of sleep stage transitions in altered affective processing.
Article in Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Frequent sleep stage transitions and abnormal sleep stage distribution are features of sleep disorders, including insomnia, sleep apnea, and narcolepsy, and have been associated with altered affective processing, including mood disorders. Research on the role of sleep stage transitions is nascent, and mixed operationalizations abound. In this comparative methods study, we overview the ways that prior research has operationalized sleep stage transitions, propose guidelines for four types of metrics, and compare the relevance of each for different analytic purposes. We then discuss three definitional and methodological "hard problems" for research on sleep stage transitions: bias due to scoring discrepancies, low temporal resolution, and opposing definitions of transitions. We discuss the pros and cons of several solutions that use machine learning (ML) scoring algorithms, with examples derived from the Stanford Sleep and Affect polysomnography dataset scored with validated ML algorithms (Stanford STAGES, U-Sleep, and YASA), and conclude with a call to return to descriptive physiological studies to shift the current framing of sleep stage transitions away from categorical state changes. This intends to lay the foundation for further insight into the role of sleep stage transitions in affective function and in clinical dysfunction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.