Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41030510›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Muscle or Fascial System Lesion (Part I): Understanding the Continuum From Micro to Macro From a Clinical Perspective.

Saverio Colonna, Fabio Casacci, Paolo MInafra

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Saverio ColonnaRehabilitation Medicine, Spine Center, Bologna, ITA.
Fabio CasacciRehabilitation Medicine, Spine Center, Bologna, ITA.
Paolo MInafraRadiology, Affidea Modena, Bologna, ITA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Muscle injuries are the most common traumatic events in both team and individual sports, representing a significant cause of time lost from training and competition. Traditionally described as "muscle tears," these injuries have been interpreted almost exclusively from a contractile perspective. However, emerging evidence highlights the critical role of the myoconnective architecture, comprising the intramuscular connective tissue (endomysium, perimysium, and epimysium), aponeuroses, basal lamina, and extracellular matrix, in force transmission, injury susceptibility, and tissue repair. This narrative review integrates anatomical, histological, and biomechanical evidence to describe skeletal muscle as a composite unit in which passive connective structures function synergistically with active contractile elements. Particular attention is given to the role of the myoaponeurotic and myofascial junctions, frequent sites of indirect, stretch-related injuries, and to the elastic properties of aponeurotic and fascial tissues in energy storage and dissipation during locomotion. Understanding how microscopic organization influences macroscopic injury mechanisms reframes muscle injury as a lesion primarily affecting the myoconnective interfaces rather than isolated muscle fibers. This paradigm shift has implications for diagnosis, prognosis, and rehabilitation, emphasizing the need for preventive and therapeutic strategies that target both contractile and connective components. Part II of this series will apply this framework to the medial gastrocnemius lesion ("tennis leg"), illustrating how detailed knowledge of myoconnective anatomy informs clinical decision-making in sports medicine.

Indexed as

aponeurosiselastic energy storagefascial systemintramuscular connective tissue (imct)muscle injurymuscle strainmyoaponeurotic injurymyoconnective junctionmyotendinous junction (mtj)sports medicine

Identifiers

PMID41030510
PMCPMC12477557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.