ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
A queuing game theory approach to strategies for supplementing medical alliances with internet hospitals.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With large hospitals actively establishing Internet-based healthcare initiatives to facilitate the downward referral of discharged patients, it is essential to examine the conditions under which such implementations are truly beneficial. This study categorizes medical alliances (MAs) into two types: tightly integrated and loosely integrated. Utilizing queuing-game theory, we constructed a two-stage model to evaluate referral efficiency, measured by the volume of downward referrals from tertiary hospitals and the effort levels exerted by community hospitals. By comparing MAs with and without supplementary internet hospitals, we identify the circumstances in which hospital-established internet hospitals enhance patient referrals. The findings indicate that within tightly integrated MAs, the referral volume increases with the potential patient arrival rate. When the cost coefficient of internet hospitals is low, MAs that incorporate internet hospitals demonstrate both higher referral volumes and increased effort, with profits favored by Internet-based healthcare under low arrival rates. In loosely integrated MAs, effort levels exhibit a similar pattern while referral volume depends heavily on the revenue-sharing ratio of the internet hospital. Specifically, referral volume increases when the ratio is low, arrival rates are high, and cost coefficients remain low. Conversely, at high revenue-sharing ratios, referral volumes rise regardless of the cost coefficient, provided arrival rates are either low or high. For tertiary hospitals, profits are higher with Internet-based healthcare only under low arrival rates when the revenue-sharing ratio is low; this threshold declines as the cost coefficient increases. When the ratio is high, digital healthcare consistently yields higher profits. For community hospitals, a low ratio leads to higher profits only within a moderate range of arrival rates-a range that narrows with rising cost coefficients. Under high ratios, profitability improves only at low arrival rates and increases alongside the cost coefficient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.