ReviewFrontiers in public health2025
Beyond the rules: an integrative review of parental perspectives on safer infant sleep in shared environments.
Review in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Safer Sleep Guidance in Standalone UK Smartphone Apps for Parents of Newborns and Infants: Systematic mHealth App Review.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2026Pooled it
- Caregiver lived experiences attempting to follow safe sleep recommendations to sleep their baby in a cot: a qualitative directed content analysis.Primary health care research & development · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Despite public health campaigns promoting infant sleep safety, SUDI (including SIDS and fatal sleep accidents) remains one of the most significant contributors to post-neonatal infant death in many high-income countries. Bedsharing remains common despite predominant risk elimination guidelines, with many families struggling to follow rigid rules of avoidance. Risk minimisation considers the complexities of family life and recognises most infant deaths in shared sleep environments are associated with additional risk factors. Purpose and methods: Integrative review methodology was used to investigate the information parents need to minimise risk for infants under 12 months who share a sleep surface. Database searches included Scopus, CINAHL, PubMed, PsycNET and Emcare to identify peer-reviewed publications published January 2013-March 2025. Quality appraisal was undertaken using the QuADs tool. Results: A total of 60 articles met eligibility criteria. Twelve themes were generated from the data and grouped under four key domains: 1. Challenges in creating safer shared sleep environments, 2. Solutions/strategies used by parents to address challenges, 3. Family experiences when risk factors are present, and 4. Information needs of parents and caregivers. Families reported sharing sleep with infants, intentionally and accidentally, including those at a higher risk of SUDI. Bedsharing often occurs outside of a conscious parental 'choice', while families frequently refrain from disclosing bedsharing practices to health professionals. In the absence of formal guidance on safer shared sleep strategies, families generated their own solutions potentially increasing risk. Conclusion: Parents need universal access to non-judgmental, neutrally-worded support that allows them to 'prepare to share' and employ strategies to enhance infant sleep safety wherever, and whenever it occurs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.