Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41030322›Full record

ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025

Mapping the task-general and task-specific neural correlates of speech production: Meta-analysis and fMRI direct comparisons of category fluency and picture naming.

Gina F Humphreys, Matthew A Lambon Ralph

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gina F HumphreysMRC Cognition & Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4157-3409
Matthew A Lambon RalphMRC Cognition & Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5907-2488

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Improving our understanding of the neural network engaged by different forms of speech production is a crucial step for both cognitive and clinical neuroscience. We achieved this aim by exploring two of the most commonly utilised speech production paradigms in research and the clinic, which have been rarely, if ever, compared directly: picture naming and category fluency. This goal was achieved in this two study investigation through a full ALE meta-analysis as well as a targeted fMRI study. Harnessing the similarities and differences between the two tasks offers a powerful methodology to delineate the core systems recruited for speech production, as well as revealing task-specific processes. The results showed that both tasks engaged a bilateral fronto-temporal speech production network, including executive and motor frontal areas, as well as semantic representational regions in the ATL, bilaterally. In addition, it was found that the extent of relative frontal lateralisation was task-dependent with the more executively-demanding category fluency task showing augmented left hemisphere activation. The results have implications for neurocomputational speech production models and the clinical assessment of speech production impairments.

Indexed as

category fluencyfMRImeta-analysispicture namingspeech production

Identifiers

PMID41030322
PMCPMC12477641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.