Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41030290›Full record

ArticlePNAS nexus2025

Can reminder emails compel Americans to save? A two-million-person megastudy.

Katherine L Milkman, Sean F Ellis, Dena M Gromet, Isabella M DeMay, Heather N Graci, Youngwoo Jung, Rayyan S Mobarak, Ramon A Silvera Zumaran, Mia N Simmons, Christophe Van den Bulte and 10 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PNAS nexus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Katherine L MilkmanDepartment of Operations, Information and Decisions, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9706-4830
Sean F EllisBehavior Change for Good Initiative, The Wharton School and the School of Arts and Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6099-0999
Dena M GrometBehavior Change for Good Initiative, The Wharton School and the School of Arts and Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9153-7193
Isabella M DeMayBehavior Change for Good Initiative, The Wharton School and the School of Arts and Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4601-8198
Heather N GraciBehavioral Scientist, Washington, DC 20005, USA.
Youngwoo JungBehavior Change for Good Initiative, The Wharton School and the School of Arts and Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-9621-6676
Rayyan S MobarakDepartment of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA.
Ramon A Silvera ZumaranDepartment of Social and Decision Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Mia N SimmonsMendoza College of Business, University of Notre Dame, South Bend, IN 46556, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0144-829X
Christophe Van den BulteDepartment of Marketing, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9708-1596
Shlomo BenartziAnderson School of Management, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Matthew HilcheyBehavioural Economics in Action at Rotman, Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada M5S 3E6.
Laura GoodyearBehavioural Economics in Action at Rotman, Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada M5S 3E6.
Dean KarlanKellogg School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0164-1398
Nina MazarQuestrom School of Business, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8248-654X
Daniel MochonA.B. Freeman School of Business, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA 70118, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1734-0808
Avni M ShahRotman School of Management, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada M5S 3E6.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3810-2398
Dilip SomanRotman School of Management, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada M5S 3E6.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5998-4153
Jonathan ZinmanDepartment of Economics, Dartmouth College, Dartmouth, Hanover, NH 03755, USA.
Angela L DuckworthDepartment of Operations, Information and Decisions, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2644-3729

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the United States, 24% of adults have no savings and 39% have less than a month of income saved. We present results from a megastudy where nearly 2 million customers of a US bank were randomly assigned to receive one of seven different 2-month email campaigns, each employing a different behavioral science insight to nudge one-time and recurring savings deposits and increase savings balances or to a control condition without such messages. These campaigns increased the probability of making a one-time savings deposit, on average, by 0.05 percentage points (a 0.51% increase over control). The best-performing campaign delivered weekly messages to customers that differed depending on recent savings behavior: messages to customers who had not made a savings account deposit in the last week included a simple reminder to save, while those to customers who had made a savings account deposit in the prior week were congratulated on this accomplishment. This top-performing campaign increased the monthly likelihood that a customer made a one-time savings deposit by 0.13 percentage points (a 1.32% increase). We estimate that rolling this 2-month campaign out to everyone in our megastudy population would have led to an extra $6,123,996 to $9,910,090 in savings. Together, our findings highlight that light-touch, frequent email nudges can cost-effectively create small increases in savings deposits in the United States. Ideally, to generate meaningful benefits, behavioral science insights would be incorporated into a wider range of communications and incentives designed by financial institutions.

Indexed as

field experimentmegastudyone-time transferrecurring transfersavings

Identifiers

PMID41030290
PMCPMC12477529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.