ReviewBioengineering & translational medicine2025
Oral tissue spheroid, organoid, and organ-on chip microphysiological modeling strategies towards enhanced emulation of health and disease.
Review in Bioengineering & translational medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of a Multi-Organ Microphysiological (MPS) Model to Study Age-Related Comorbidities.Advanced biology · 2026Article
- Article
- Oral Barrier Immunometabolism in Chronic Low-Grade Inflammation: Molecular Mechanisms and Systemic Implications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Oral tissue spheroid, organoid, and organ-on chip microphysiological modeling strategies towards enhanced emulation of health and disease.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2025Review
- Biomimetic bone-vessel interface-on-a-chip for simulating periodontal physiological and pathological microenvironment.Regenerative biomaterials · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Diseases and disorders of dental, oral, and craniofacial (DOC) tissues represent a significant global health burden and have been found to have the greatest age-standardized prevalence and incidence of all reported diseases worldwide. While the application of novel therapies has been suggested to address the different types of oral health diseases, only a limited number of interventional regenerative therapies have been reported to improve clinical therapeutic outcomes. The lack of novel therapies in DOC tissue regeneration may be in part attributed to the highly resource-intensive translational path from preclinical models to clinical trials. Recently, stakeholders and regulatory agencies have begun to encourage the use of alternative preclinical models using human tissues for testing therapeutic interventions in place of animal models. This advocacy may provide an opportunity to reduce or eliminate animal testing, ultimately limiting resource expenditure and providing a more efficient regulatory pathway for the approval of novel DOC therapies. While the complexity of DOC physiology, defects, and diseases is not effectively recapitulated in traditional 2D or 3D in vitro culture models, the emergence of more sophisticated in vitro models (or so-called microphysiological systems that include spheroid, organoid and organ on-chip (OoC) systems) has enabled effective modeling of clinically simulated disease states in several DOC tissue and organ systems. Here, we aim to provide an overview and collective comparison of these microphysiological systems, outline their current uses in DOC research, and identify important gaps in both their utilization and abilities to recapitulate essential features of native oral-craniofacial physiology, towards enabling the therapeutic performance of de novo interventions targeted at regeneration outcomes in vivo.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.