Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41030276›Full record

ReviewBioengineering & translational medicine2025

Oral tissue spheroid, organoid, and organ-on chip microphysiological modeling strategies towards enhanced emulation of health and disease.

Z Gouveia, A Özkan, W V Giannobile, J P Santerre, D T Wu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering & translational medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Z GouveiaDepartment of Oral Medicine, Infection, and Immunity Harvard School of Dental Medicine Boston USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9702-3935
A ÖzkanWyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering Harvard University Boston USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3825-5899
W V GiannobileDepartment of Oral Medicine, Infection, and Immunity Harvard School of Dental Medicine Boston USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7102-9746
J P SanterreFaculty of Dentistry University of Toronto Toronto Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3373-6463
D T WuDepartment of Oral Medicine, Infection, and Immunity Harvard School of Dental Medicine Boston USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9752-5377

Funding

RESEARCH TRAINING IN NEPHROLOGYT32DK007199 · NIDDK · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI POLLAK, MARTIN R. · 1986 to 2022
$6.0M
Organ Design and Engineering Training Program (ODET Program)T32EB016652 · NIBIB · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI BONVENTRE, JOSEPH VINCENT · 2014 to 2023
$3.5M
NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB016652NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007199
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diseases and disorders of dental, oral, and craniofacial (DOC) tissues represent a significant global health burden and have been found to have the greatest age-standardized prevalence and incidence of all reported diseases worldwide. While the application of novel therapies has been suggested to address the different types of oral health diseases, only a limited number of interventional regenerative therapies have been reported to improve clinical therapeutic outcomes. The lack of novel therapies in DOC tissue regeneration may be in part attributed to the highly resource-intensive translational path from preclinical models to clinical trials. Recently, stakeholders and regulatory agencies have begun to encourage the use of alternative preclinical models using human tissues for testing therapeutic interventions in place of animal models. This advocacy may provide an opportunity to reduce or eliminate animal testing, ultimately limiting resource expenditure and providing a more efficient regulatory pathway for the approval of novel DOC therapies. While the complexity of DOC physiology, defects, and diseases is not effectively recapitulated in traditional 2D or 3D in vitro culture models, the emergence of more sophisticated in vitro models (or so-called microphysiological systems that include spheroid, organoid and organ on-chip (OoC) systems) has enabled effective modeling of clinically simulated disease states in several DOC tissue and organ systems. Here, we aim to provide an overview and collective comparison of these microphysiological systems, outline their current uses in DOC research, and identify important gaps in both their utilization and abilities to recapitulate essential features of native oral-craniofacial physiology, towards enabling the therapeutic performance of de novo interventions targeted at regeneration outcomes in vivo.

Indexed as

microphysiological culture systemsoral healthorganoidorgan on chipregenerative medicinespheroidtissue engineeringtranslation

Identifiers

PMID41030276
PMCPMC12478447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.