ArticleBioengineering & translational medicine2025
Spatial-hindrance-based pro-Adalimumab prevents anti-idiotypic antibody interference in pharmacokinetic and therapeutic efficacy.
Article in Bioengineering & translational medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tumor-associated protease-activated anti-CD47 antibody precisely maintains phagocytic ability of macrophages with minimal effect on healthy tissue.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Spatial-hindrance-based pro-Adalimumab prevents anti-idiotypic antibody interference in pharmacokinetic and therapeutic efficacy.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adalimumab (Humira) represents a major advance in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) therapy. However, with long-term administration of Adalimumab, anti-idiotypic antibody (anti-Id Ab) accelerates the Adalimumab clearance rate and reduces the therapeutic effect. To avoid the interference of anti-Id Ab, we used an autologous hinge region as a spatial-hindrance-based Ab lock and connected it to the N-terminal of the light chain and heavy chain via substrate peptides (MMP-2/9) to cover the CDR binding site of Adalimumab to generate pro-Adalimumab. The Ab lock masks the complementarity-determining regions (CDRs) of Adalimumab, thus avoiding interference from anti-Id Ab. Pro-Adalimumab demonstrated a 241.6 times weaker binding ability to TNFɑ than Adalimumab. In addition, pro-Adalimumab showed a 46.6-fold greater blocking of anti-Adalimumab Id Ab in comparison to Adalimumab prior to activation. Similar results were observed with other clinical antibodies, such as pro-Infliximab (anti-TNFɑ Ab) and pro-Nivolumab (anti-PD-1). Furthermore, pro-Adalimumab maintained consistent pharmacokinetics regardless of the presence of anti-Adalimumab Id antibodies, while Adalimumab showed a 49% clearance increase, resulting in a near complete loss of function. Additionally, pro-Adalimumab was able to avoid neutralization and efficiently reduce RA progression in the presence of anti-Adalimumab Id Ab in vivo. In summary, we developed a pro-Adalimumab that avoids interference from anti-Id Abs, thereby addressing the biggest issue limiting clinical efficacy. The findings enclosed herein may have potentially broad application in antibody therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.