Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41030020›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2025

Editorial: Real-World Outcomes of Disease-Modifying Therapies Highlight the Need for Diagnostic Biomarkers in Early Alzheimer's Disease.

Dinah V Parums

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Dinah V ParumsScience Editor, Medical Science Monitor, International Scientific Information, Inc., Melville, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The promise of targeted humanized monoclonal antibody therapies to amyloid ß and tau protein in Alzheimer's disease from clinical trial data has not been realized when put to the test in real-world studies and practice. There have been regulatory approvals for diagnostic blood tests in China, Japan (HISCL Aß42/40), and the United Kingdom (UK) (PrecivityAD2). On May 16, 2025, the US FDA approved the Lumipulse G blood test, which utilizes the plasma pTau217/Aß1-42 ratio, for the diagnosis of cerebral amyloid plaques in symptomatic patients of 55 years or more. Biological biomarkers and targets are currently being evaluated in phase 1 to phase 3 clinical trials, to rapidly implement less invasive blood-based assays to detect tau species and neurofilament light (NfL). However, clinical validation of the diagnostic value of identifying blood biomarkers still requires support from amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) brain scans and/or the results of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis. This editorial aims to identify how real-world outcomes of new disease-modifying therapies highlight the need for diagnostic biomarkers for early Alzheimer's disease and the current status of biomarkers identified by blood plasma, CSF, and imaging.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseBiomarkersAmyloid beta-PeptidesHumansPositron-Emission Tomographytau ProteinsAmyloid beta-PeptidesBiomarkerstau Proteins

Identifiers

PMID41030020
PMCPMC12499630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.