ArticleFacts, views & vision in ObGyn2025
Dual operating in gynaecological endoscopy: towards a culture of shared learning and safer surgery.
Article in Facts, views & vision in ObGyn, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Buddy operating in gynaecological endoscopy: what should this model of surgical practice look like?Facts, views & vision in ObGyn · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dual operating is increasingly recognised as a valuable strategy in complex gynaecological surgery. Models include supervising (trainer-trainee), buddy (comparable proficiency within a specialty), and inter-specialty (collaboration across specialities). Each approach offers unique benefits for patient safety, surgical training, and surgeon wellbeing. Buddy operating in particular promotes peer-to-peer learning, shared responsibility, and enhances decision-making. As minimally invasive gynaecology evolves, embedding these models into practice may strengthen training, and improve outcomes and workforce resilience. Further evidence is needed to evaluate long-term benefits and cost-effectiveness in different clinical contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.