ArticleTurkish journal of orthodontics2025
Orbital Compartment Stress Responses Related to Rapid Maxillary Expansion: A Finite Element Analysis.
Article in Turkish journal of orthodontics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to use finite element analysis to evaluate the effects of acrylic HYRAX and hybrid HYRAX devices in the treatment of rapid maxillary expansion (RME), particularly on the orbital compartments. Methods: In the present study, a craniofacial model was developed utilizing computed tomography data obtained from the visible human project. A total of four distinct models were generated by designating the sutures in the adult variation as closed and those in the non-adult variation as open while incorporating both expansion devices into the model. Both acrylic and hybrid device models were subjected to expansion forces of 0.25 mm and 5 mm, yielding eight distinct scenarios for comprehensive analysis. Results: Significant stress and displacement were observed, particularly around the orbital compartments in all scenarios. Displacement decreased with increased sutural ossification and the resulting stresses demonstrated elevation. In adult models, the hybrid device generated reduced stress, especially around the orbital compartments. Conclusion: Based on these findings, it is proposed that the orbital compartments may serve as a clinically relevant site for measuring the increased intracranial pressure during RME treatment. To prevent possible side effects, RME should be performed at an early age, and if ossification is suspected to be increased, bone-supported expansion devices are recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.