ArticleTurkish journal of orthodontics2025
Evaluation of Postural Balance, Cervical Lordosis and Neck Disability after Orthognathic Surgery.
Article in Turkish journal of orthodontics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The present study aimed to investigate changes in cervical lordosis, neck disability, and postural balance through static and dynamic tests in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion who were treated with bimaxillary orthognathic surgery. Methods: In this prospective observational study, 18 patients (mean age 23.3±5.4 years) with maxillary retrusion and mandibular prognathia were treated by bimaxillary orthognathic surgery. Static and dynamic balance tests were recorded with the Kinesthetic Ability Trainer preoperatively (T1) and at least 2 months postoperatively (T2). Cervical lordosis angle (C2-C7) was evaluated with the posterior tangent method on the lateral cephalometric films taken at T1 and T2. Neck disability and pain were assessed through questionnaires at both time points. Results: The median follow-up time was 5.8 months. The mean maxillary advancement was 4.0 mm at point A (p=0.001). The mean mandibular setback was 2.4 mm at point B (p=0.166). An 8.4 mm maxillomandibular correction was observed according to the Wits appraisal (p=0.001). Static and dynamic balance tests, cervical lordosis angle, neck disability, and pain revealed no significant change between T1 and T2. No statistically significant correlation was observed between surgical movements and changes in the cervical lordosis angle. Conclusion: Orthognathic surgical correction of skeletal Class III malocclusion, -primarily through maxillary advancement with less mandibular setback- did not lead to significant changes in cervical lordosis, neck disability, or postural balance as assessed through static and dynamic tests.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.