SynthesisReproductive health2025
Accessibility of sexual and reproductive health services among women with motor disabilities in low- and middle-income countries in Africa: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Reproductive health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccess to sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services is recognized as a fundamental human right and a core priority within global health agendas, particularly under the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Despite significant legal advances such as the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities women with motor disabilities continue to face persistent marginalization, especially in low- and middle-income African countries. This systematic review aims to identify the barriers and facilitating factors influencing their access to SRH services.
methodsFollowing PRISMA guidelines and registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024555816), this review adopted a Population, Concept, Context (PCC) search strategy. Studies published between 2001 and 2024 in English and French were retrieved from major electronic databases and grey literature sources. Data extraction and methodological assessment were conducted independently by multiple reviewers. A narrative synthesis was used for qualitative findings and a descriptive approach for quantitative data.
resultsTwenty-eight studies covering eleven African countries were included. The main barriers identified were grouped into five categories: physical and logistical constraints, social and attitudinal barriers, institutional limitations, economic hardships, and informational and communication barriers. Key facilitating factors included healthcare provider training, infrastructure adaptation, community mobilization, and the development of inclusive public health policies.
conclusionThis review highlights the urgent need to embed disability inclusion within national SRH policies and to promote multisectoral strategies that address the systemic inequalities limiting access for women with motor disabilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.