Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41029798›Full record

ArticleContraception and reproductive medicine2025

Usage of contraception among the married women in India, 2019-21: a cross-sectional study.

Chander Shekhar, Harihar Sahoo, Labhita Das

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contraception and reproductive medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chander ShekharInternational Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai, India.
Harihar SahooDepartment of Family & Generations, International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400088, India.
Labhita DasDepartment of Community Medicine, Parul Institute of Medical Sciences & Research (PIMSR), Parul University, Vadodara, Gujarat, India. labhita.das40163@paruluniversity.ac.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundContraceptive use plays a significant role in reducing fertility and improving maternal and child health. Understanding utilization patterns and preferences is essential for addressing unmet needs in family planning among married women in India.

objectiveThis study aims to analyse the usage of contraceptive methods among the married women aged 15-49 years in India, and to identify the factors associated with contraceptive uptake.

methodsCross-sectional data from the fifth round of the National Family Health Survey, (2019-21) were used for this analysis. NFHS is a periodic cross-sectional survey conducted using a multistage household sampling design in India. The total sample consisted of 512,408 women aged 15-49 years currently in a marital union. Cross-tabulation was conducted to evaluate the levels of contraceptive use, and logistic regression was utilized to identify factors associated with contraceptive uptake. The entire analysis was performed using the STATA 17.0 statistical software.

resultsContraceptive usage among married women has increased from 53.5% in NFHS-4 (2015-16) to 65.7% in NFHS-5 (2019-21). The likelihood of contraception usage among the married women in India is significantly influenced by the factors like age of the women, educational attainment, desire for children, caste, religion, wealth index, exposure to mass media and place of residence.

conclusionDespite advancements in reproductive health, contraceptive uptake among married women in India remains insufficient. To address this, interventions should prioritize the provision of diverse contraceptive options, along with comprehensive counselling, to emphasize the benefits and proper use of these methods. Addressing socio-demographic disparities is essential for improving equitable access to family planning services.

Indexed as

Contraceptive methodsCross-sectionalIndiaNFHSUnmet need

Identifiers

PMID41029798
PMCPMC12487562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.