ReviewKnee surgery & related research2025
From empirical to analytical: Soft-tissue tension gauging in total knee arthroplasty.
Review in Knee surgery & related research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Precision soft tissue balance in robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty: a bibliometric and visualization analysis of dynamic gap equilibration.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Agreement and Systematic Differences Between Intraoperative ROSA Hip-Knee-Ankle Measurements and Standing Radiographic Alignment After Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Agreement Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty is associated with more favorable early patient-reported outcomes and may attenuate experience-related outcome differences.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Intraoperative balance in total knee arthroplasty : Development and internal validation of the Knee Balancing Score.Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Soft-tissue balancing is essential for achieving optimal outcomes in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), significantly impacting postoperative joint function, patient satisfaction, and implant longevity. Despite advancements in surgical techniques, traditional methods for evaluating soft-tissue tension remain largely subjective, leading to inconsistent outcomes and patient dissatisfaction. Recent technological developments, particularly the integration of digital devices, have shown promise in transforming soft-tissue balancing from a subjective art into a reproducible science. This manuscript is a narrative review that systematically summarizes the historical and technological evolution of soft-tissue tension gauging methods in TKA, encompassing experiential methods, mechanical tensors, and contemporary digital sensors. We critically discuss the strengths, limitations, and available clinical evidence for each method. Furthermore, this review highlights the integration of robotic systems and provides insights into future translational strategies, emphasizing artificial-intelligence-driven personalized soft-tissue balancing as a promising therapeutic direction. This review further comprehensively discusses soft-tissue tension gauging methods in TKA, providing a clear understanding of their evolution from subjective assessments to objective digital technologies. This study provides a robust theoretical foundation for the clinical application of digital tensors and robotic technologies. Integrating these technologies with artificial intelligence can effectively transform soft-tissue balancing strategies, thereby enhancing surgical precision, patient satisfaction, and clinical outcomes in TKA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.