ArticleAlzheimer's research & therapy2025
Centiloid values from deep learning-based CT parcellation: a valid alternative to freesurfer.
Article in Alzheimer's research & therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- SPECT and PET imaging of Alzheimer's disease revisited: from biomarkers to artificial intelligence-based prediction.Annals of nuclear medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAmyloid PET/CT is essential for quantifying amyloid-beta (Aβ) deposition in Alzheimer's disease (AD), with the Centiloid (CL) scale standardizing measurements across imaging centers. However, MRI-based CL pipelines face challenges: high cost, contraindications, and patient burden. To address these challenges, we developed a deep learning-based CT parcellation pipeline calibrated to the standard CL scale using CT images from PET/CT scans and evaluated its performance relative to standard pipelines.
methodsA total of 306 participants (23 young controls [YCs] and 283 patients) underwent 18 F-florbetaben (FBB) PET/CT and MRI. Based on visual assessment, 207 patients were classified as Aβ-positive and 76 as Aβ-negative. PET images were processed using the CT parcellation pipeline and compared to FreeSurfer (FS) and standard pipelines. Agreement was assessed via regression analyses. Effect size, variance, and ROC analyses were used to compare pipelines and determine the optimal CL threshold relative to visual Aβ assessment.
resultsThe CT parcellation showed high concordance with the FS and provided reliable CL quantification (R² = 0.99). Both pipelines demonstrated similar variance in YCs and effect sizes between YCs and ADCI. ROC analyses confirmed comparable accuracy and similar CL thresholds, supporting CT parcellation as a viable MRI-free alternative.
conclusionsOur findings indicate that the CT parcellation pipeline achieves a level of accuracy similar to FS in CL quantification, demonstrating its reliability as an MRI-free alternative. In PET/CT, CT and PET are acquired sequentially within the same session on a shared bed and headrest, which helps maintain consistent positioning and adequate spatial alignment, reducing registration errors and supporting more reliable and precise quantification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.