Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41029772›Full record

ArticleExperimental hematology & oncology2025

Revisiting thrombophilia testing: leveraging next-generation sequencing for precision in VTE management.

Ilham Youssry, Nardeen Ayad

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental hematology & oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ilham YoussryHematology and BMT Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Nardeen AyadFaculty of Medicine, Cairo University Kasr Al-Ainy, Kasr Al Ainy Street, Cairo, Egypt. nardeen.e.ayad@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1482-7792

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality, particularly among individuals with inherited thrombophilia. Despite the widespread use of thrombophilia testing, its clinical value is often questioned due to inconsistent guidelines and limited prospective evidence. Traditional testing panels target only a narrow set of common variants-such as Factor V Leiden and Prothrombin G20210A-and may miss rare, complex, or combined mutations, especially in high-risk patients, including pediatric populations and those with unprovoked events or atypical presentations. This correspondence aims to re-evaluate the clinical role of thrombophilia testing in light of next-generation sequencing (NGS), a technology that offers a broader, more precise assessment of heritable thrombotic risk. We discuss how NGS improves variant detection, enhances risk stratification, and supports a precision medicine framework-particularly in clinical scenarios where standard algorithms fail. By integrating emerging evidence and real-world applications, we advocate for an updated, individualized approach to genetic testing in VTE care.

Indexed as

Genetic testingInherited thrombophiliaNext-generation sequencingPrecision medicineVenous thromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID41029772
PMCPMC12482613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.